논문투고
축산관련 논문을 투고한 자료를 모아 정보를 제공합니다. 관련자료가 없는 성과년도는 표기되지 않습니다.
논문명(한글), 논문명(영문), 성과주관부서, 품목코드, 학술지명, 주저자, 연도, 성과적용일, 첨부파일, 내용으로 구성된 글 상세입니다.
논문명(한글) |
Behavioral changes of sows with changes in flattening rate |
논문명(영문) |
Behavioral changes of sows with changes in flattening rate |
성과주관부서 |
농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 축산생명환경부 축산환경과 |
품목코드 |
축산 / 중가축 / 돼지 |
학술지명 |
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY |
주저자 |
양가영 |
성과년도 |
2021 |
성과적용일 |
2022년06월 |
In this study, considering the difficulties for all farms to convert farm styles to animal welfare- based housing, an experiment was performed to observe the changes in the behavior and welfare of sows when the slat floor was changed to a collective breeding ground. Twenty- eight sows used in this study were between the second and fifth parities to minimize the influence of parity. Using a flats floor cover, the flattening rates were treated as 0%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%. Data collection was the behavior of sows visually observed using a camera (e.g., standing, lying, fighting and excessive biting behaviors, and abnormal behaviors) and the animal welfare level measured through field visits. Lying behavior was found to be higher (p < 0.01) as the flattening rate increased, and sows lying on the slatted cover also increased as the flattening rate increased (p < 0.01). Fighting behavior wasincreased when the flattening rate was increased to 20%, and chewing behavior was increased (p < 0.05) as the flattening rate increased. The animal welfare level of sows, ‘good feeding’, it was found that all treatment groups for body condition score and water were good at 100 (p < 0.05). ‘Good housing’ was the maximum value (100) in each treatment group. As the percentage of floor increased, the minimum good housing was increased from 78 in 0% flattening rate to 96 in 50% flattening rate. The maximum (100) ‘good health’ was achieved in the 0% and 20% flattening rates, and it was 98, 98, and 99 in the 30%, 50%, and 40% flattening rate, respectively. ‘Appropriate behavior’ score was significantly lower than that of other paremeters, but when the flattening ratio was 0% and 20%, the maximum and minimum values were 10. At 40% and 50%, the maximum values were 39 and 49, respectively, and the minimum values were analyzed as 19 for both 40% and 50%. These results will be used as basic data about sow welfare for farmers to successfully transition to group housing and flat floors.