논문투고
축산관련 논문을 투고한 자료를 모아 정보를 제공합니다. 관련자료가 없는 성과년도는 표기되지 않습니다.
논문명(한글), 논문명(영문), 성과주관부서, 품목코드, 학술지명, 주저자, 연도, 성과적용일, 첨부파일, 내용으로 구성된 글 상세입니다.
논문명(한글) |
Scoping Review of Machine Learning and DeepLearning Algorithm Applications in VeterinaryClinics: Situation Analysis and Suggestions forFurther Studies |
논문명(영문) |
Scoping Review of Machine Learning and DeepLearning Algorithm Applications in VeterinaryClinics: Situation Analysis and Suggestions forFurther Studies |
성과주관부서 |
국립축산과학원 가축질병방역과 |
품목코드 |
|
학술지명 |
journal of veterinary clinics |
주저자 |
민경덕 |
성과년도 |
|
성과적용일 |
2023년09월 |
Machine learning and deep learning (ML/DL) algorithms have been
successfully applied in medical practice. However, their application in veterinary
medicine is relatively limited, possibly due to a lack in the quantity and quality
of relevant research. Because the potential demands for ML/DL applications in
veterinary clinics are significant, it is important to note the current gaps in the
literature and explore the possible directions for advancement in this field. Thus,
a scoping review was conducted as a situation analysis. We developed a search
strategy following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and
Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed and Embase databases were used in the
initial search. The identified items were screened based on predefined inclusion
and exclusion criteria. Information regarding model development, quality of
validation, and model performance was extracted from the included studies.
The current review found 55 studies that passed the criteria. In terms of target
animals, the number of studies on industrial animals was similar to that on companion
animals. Quantitative scarcity of prediction studies (n = 11, including
duplications) was revealed in both industrial and non-industrial animal studies
compared to diagnostic studies (n = 45, including duplications). Qualitative limitations
were also identified, especially regarding validation methodologies. Considering
these gaps in the literature, future studies examining the prediction and
validation processes, which employ a prospective and multi-center approach, are
highly recommended. Veterinary practitioners should acknowledge the current
limitations in this field and adopt a receptive