논문투고
축산관련 논문을 투고한 자료를 모아 정보를 제공합니다. 관련자료가 없는 성과년도는 표기되지 않습니다.
논문명(한글), 논문명(영문), 성과주관부서, 품목코드, 학술지명, 주저자, 연도, 성과적용일, 첨부파일, 내용으로 구성된 글 상세입니다.
논문명(한글) |
Nutritional value of commoncarbohydrate sources used in petfoods |
논문명(영문) |
Nutritional value of commoncarbohydrate sources used in petfoods |
성과주관부서 |
국립축산과학원 축산생명환경부 동물복지연구팀 |
품목코드 |
|
학술지명 |
Journal of Animal Science and Technology |
주저자 |
조현우,서강민 |
성과년도 |
|
성과적용일 |
2024년12월 |
Diet digestibility can vary based on factors such as the type of ingredients, processing techniques,
formulation, fiber content, and nutrient interactions. Unlike proteins and fats, there is
no specific carbohydrate requirement, which typically constitutes 30%?60% of commercial
dried dog foods. Because of the significant proportion of carbohydrates in dog food, this study
aimed to evaluate the differences in nutrient digestibility among barley, brown rice, corn,
mung bean, and rice, which are common carbohydrate sources in commercial dog foods. All
experimental diets had consistent chemical compositions. The digestibility of each carbohydrate
source was evaluated using the total feces collection method in four castrated male and
four neutered female beagles with an average age of 4.58 ± 0.14 years. The average daily
dry matter intake of the five experimental diets was 203.0 ± 3.23 g/day. The percentage of dry
matter digestibility of the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) was the highest for rice and
corn at 92.45% and 92.95%, respectively, followed by brown rice (91.61%), barley (88.81%),
and mung beans (80.74%). The percentage of nitrogen-free extract digestibility was also
high for rice, corn, and brown rice at 97.08%, 96.14%, and 95.56%, respectively, followed by
barley at 90.10% and mung bean at 83.38%. Amino acid digestibility analysis revealed no
statistically significant differences between rice, corn, brown rice, and barley, except for methionine,
which is an essential amino acid. Although the ATTD and amino acid profile of the
mung bean-based diet were less efficient than those of the other test diets, the overall digestibility
was satisfactory and there were no significant differences in palatability. The differences
in digestibility observed in mung bean-based diets compared to other grain-based diets can
be attributed to variations in the starch and fiber content of the raw materials. By leveraging
these characteristics, mung bean-based diets may offer strategic benefits for glycemic control
and weight management in dogs. Our results may serve as a basis for formulating appropriate
diets for dogs.